WordPress: Hero With Half a Dozen Faces

WordPress is a widely used PHP/MYSQL blog platform or to quote directly from the source: “WordPress is a state-of-the-art semantic personal publishing platform with a focus on aesthetics, web standards, and usability.” See the OSLiving Archive entry for more information.


In Retrospect
WordPress (WP) began in 2003 as a fork of the blog engine known as b2. The project was a joint venture by Matt Mullenweg and Mike Little. 2003 was in many ways a significant year in blog history; not only did it mark the launch of WordPress, but it was also the year in which Pyralab’s 4 year old platform, Blogger, was taken over by Google. And whereas Pyralabs had previously charged for a number of its services, Google stepped in and offered the ‘premium’ elements for free.

The third pillar underpinning the ‘blogopshere’ at that point was Movable Type (MT). It was only last year (June 2007) that the decision was made to release MT software under a GPLv2 license; prior to this it had been a closed source, fee-based platform. Then in 2004 came the release of version 3.0 and with it the famous/infamous decision to adopt tighter restrictions on licensing fees. This decision prompted a significant portion of the MT userbase to shift to the up and coming Open Source platform known as WordPress.

The Open Source Solution
Releasing WP under an Open Source license was perhaps the single most important decision in its short history. Not only did it allow for rapid user growth, but more importantly it led to one of the biggest developer communities on the Internet. [This is particularly true in terms of WP peripeherals such as themes and plugins]. The ability to customise and ‘engineer’ ramifications of the software led to a strong sense of loyalty and ‘ownership’ that guaranteed future growth. The second most important decision was the introduction of WordPress.com, the more commercial browser-based verion of the WordPress platform aimed at casual users or users who don’t require a stand alone setup. WordPress.com cemented the WP brand and brought the platform to an even wider audience; this marked a crucial leap from ‘geek’ to ‘street’.

In part then, we owe the rise of the blogosphere to this common shift from propietary to Open Source, or in the Blogger case, from ‘premium’ to ‘free’. Over the past 5 years WordPress has lead the way in terms of innovation, experimenting with a liberal and diverse application of its core functions, ranging from blog networks, forums and microblogging to its most recent sidelines: social networking. The first two notable examples I want to go over here are WordPress MU (multi-user) and BBpress (simple forum software).

WordPress MU
MU is a version of WordPress that allows you to run multiple blogs with a single install of WordPress. It is used by Newspapers and magazines such as Le Monde, Harvard University also users it to power student blogs and it can be used to set up blog networks. However. one of the main problems with MU is that unlike its big brother WP, it suffers from a degree of development neglect and as a more experimental wing of the platform it has a far smaller backing. This is a real shame given that WP has attained superstar status and has enough financial clout to easily pour money into MU and bring it up to date with all the features we’ve come to expect from the main WP software.

BBpress is a WP ‘sibling’, it’s “plain and simple forum software … easy to use, easy to administrate, fast and clean.” The main point with BBpress is its ‘ease’ of integration with a stand alone WP blog. Yes, it requires its own database and template system but BBPress can communicate with WP to retrieve user meta data, shared cookies for authentication and it is possible for BBPress to access some of the WP functions. BBPress offers a solid yet lightweight alternative to some of the larger Open Source forum software and has been modified to great effect on sites such as 9rules.

Prologue Theme
Delving ever deeper into the WP portfolio and we find some of the more recent additions, most notably the Prologue theme and BuddyPress. The Prologue theme was released in January 2008 by the Automattic team (Automattic is the start-up company that develops WP) as a response to the ‘microblogging’ trend made popular by Twitter (follow us on Twitter) and Pownce. Prologue runs as a typical WordPress theme but it’s real potential lies in the ability to share short messages with friends and colleagues about what you’re doing or what you’re working on. Using it is simple, login to your user account and type straight into the text box on the theme’s front page.

Last but not least is BuddyPress. This is a project that is currently still in development. BuddyPress is essentially a set of plugins that transform an installation of WordPress MU into a social network platform:

“BuddyPress removes the main focus of WordPress MU away from blogs, moving it more towards the actual member themselves. However, members can still blog and use all the blogging features they would normally expect from WordPress. When someone uses BuddyPress, they will be going there to build or enhance their profile first, and write something on their blog second. The blog is basically turned into another component of BuddyPress.” (Source).

BuddyPress brings onboard groups, friends, private messaging, media share and more. It is a reponse to the huge social networking trend that has developed over the last few years, spearheaded by the likes of Facebook, Youtube and Flickr. I can’t help but feel that BuddyPress like the Prologue theme arrive somewhat too late on the scene to be called ‘innovations’, but what they demonstrate is the adaptability and intelligence of the WP platform.

In looking back over the WP portfolio, it occured to me that there may be an argument for the centralisation of WP and its various branches. The ability fo switch ‘face’ at the click of a button through a central dashboard seems like a logical step. Right now each component requires a separate install, the technology is not always 100% compatible and the huge differences in terms of demand and popularity dictate the outcome of each piece of software, but as technology develops, so will WP. Perhaps one day we may get to see a complete Automattic Open Source tool kit with a single 5 minute install, where the user is free to activate or deactivate core features … wouldn’t that be nice!

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

Trackback Address

  1. [...] Hero Products: WordPress: Hero With Half a Dozen Faces covers the history and various products offered by Automattic and [...]

    Pingback by WordPress Wednesday News: WordCamps Everywhere, Webware 100 Again, Plugins to Fix WordPress 2.5, Change Admin Colors, and More : The Blog Herald — April 23, 2008 @ 5:45 pm

Comments 12 comments | Leave a comment »

Gravatar Icon
Mar 31st, 2008, 11:28 pm | #

I love WP.

Gravatar Icon
Mar 31st, 2008, 11:39 pm | #

We love WP too alifaan and given that it powers both the Archive and this blog, I thought it was time to do somewhat of a tribute post.

Gravatar Icon
Jacob Santos
Apr 24th, 2008, 2:32 am | #

WordPress is spelled with a 'P'. You will notice that every reference to WordPress has the P uppercase.

Basically, no information has been released nor probably will be released until it is ready, which explains why you don't know.

However, what you are saying in the conclusion is already happening. That is not to say that you'll be able to switch between each on one install, but is to say that it will use a single core, so that a fix in WordPress for the template system will be a fix in bbPress for the template system, as well as the other applications.

Gravatar Icon
Apr 24th, 2008, 2:52 am | #


Thank you for your comment and for realigning the p's and q's.

Gravatar Icon
Aug 1st, 2008, 2:22 am | #

WordPress is one of the best for content management .

I love WP..


Gravatar Icon
Aug 3rd, 2008, 7:53 am | #

We use wordpress for every single one of our blogs. There are so many wonderful features. Love it!!


Gravatar Icon
Sep 18th, 2008, 9:12 am | #

WordPress is bar far the best for control and management for design and content. Nice review…

Gravatar Icon
Software Reviews
Sep 30th, 2008, 6:04 am | #

WordPress is recommended for quality blogging. I have many websites running wordpress. I am very impressed.

Gravatar Icon
caleta de fuste
Nov 2nd, 2008, 1:18 am | #

WordPress is the best for content management.

Gravatar Icon
Nov 8th, 2008, 1:57 am | #

WordPress is the best platform not only for blogging but works well as content management for small companies looking for a basic and easy to use application to make themselves seen

Gravatar Icon
Apr 3rd, 2011, 12:30 am | #

Замечательный сайт. Хочу предложить свою информацию. Программа «Контроль веса и питания», предназначена для всех кто хочет похудеть и начать правильно питаться. Программа позволит контролировать количество калорий, которое Вы потребляете ежедневно. Анализировать изменение значений объема груди, талии и бедер. Строить графики для анализа. Подробнее на сайте nokaloriy.ru

Leave a comment

Comment Guidelines:
You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted.

Email addresses will never be published.


The OSLiving blog addresses issues of import in a broadly based Open Source context. It is a space for information, opinion and informed debate.

Discover software reviews and interviews with leading figures in the field, commentary on current Open Source issues and musings on all things WordPress.

If you'd like to contribute a guest article to the blog, please get in touch.

Sites We Like

SourceForge - one of the longest running portals devoted to housing projects from the Open Source community. A great place to find OSS projects to collaborate on.

Open Source Initiative - the OSI maintains the Open Source Definition and offers a range of information on OSS licensing and standards.

OSALT - a brilliant site devoted to open source alternatives. The site compares quality OSS with its commercial peers.

Got a great OSS link? Let us know.